Milwaukee Parents

WELCOME to

the Parent Page of MPA/Milwaukee Professionals Association. We are one of 25 workforce groups indentified in Campaign Neighborhood - CFNBA Smart Growth 5-Year Signature Plan (2005–2010) for professional growth in the next 5 years.

We will address 30 specifics that affect our children in MPS/Milwaukee Public Schools as well as Charter and Choice Schools in Milwaukee.

Issues of prime importance and concern are:

  • 3-, 6-, 9-month and annual board meeting held in the community conducive to parent involvement (time and place)
  • a parent blog on MPS website
  • achievement growth and improvement in MPS
  • best practices and customer care
  • board members accountability
  • board members constituent services
  • daily interactions with school sites
  • decision making of policies affecting MPS students
  • digital divide of parents and students
  • failure to communicate and provide information to make parents “equal partners” for corrections where needed
  • hiring parents
  • increases in benefits for MPS staff but decrease in performance w/MPS students
  • joint quarterly and annual meetings during DIFI status
  • library, sports and the arts
  • MPA-Parent Group as one of the partners for strategic planning
  • MPS recent two-three year failure with “NO Child Left Behind” and the DIFI Plan
  • MPS Title I DAC monthly communications
  • MPS Title I DAC selection and decision making for board
  • MPS Title I District Advisory Board communication w/state and local bodies (DPI/MPS board/MPS superintendent)
  • negative branding of students - at risk, disadvantaged, minority
  • parent responsibilities and accountability
  • parent training and in-servicing
  • parents as planners and decision makers
  • parents recognized at the state(DPI/Department of Public Instruction) and local (MPS) level
  • state superintendent inclusive plan for MPS parents
  • state superintendent role, responsibility and accountability in DIFI status districts
  • student responsibilities and accountability
  • superintendent and MPS staff respecting rights and responsibility of students
  • superintendent and MPS staff respecting rights of parents
  • unused libraries
  • use of city law enforcement in schools
  • use of radio station for communicating issues and concerns regarding parents (parent-use and MPS)

This is our Parent Services Membership Page devoted to professional development and events for Parent Empowerment, especially Milwaukeeans.

Services are provided for parents through various government-funded and private sources that will raise the level of marketability of parent skills, this would include connection with the Department of Public Instruction, Milwaukee Public Schools, UW-M, MATC, Cardinal Stritch and other higher education sites.

We will also share information devoted to CN-CFNBA Technology Network and introduce resources for parents.

All members of Milwaukee Professional Services must be or become computer savvy. Their first pre-requisite is an “email address”.


Marquette forum on MPS
By Alan J. Borsuk
Tuesday, Apr 1 2008, 11:40 AM

Peter Blewett, the president of the Milwaukee School Board, and Dennis Oulahan, the president of the Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association, will take part in a panel discussion on the state of edcation in Milwaukee Public Schools at 4 p.m. Monday in the conference center in Marquette University’s Raynor Libraryer at 1355 W. Wisconsin Ave.

Kathleen Cepelka, associate dean of the Marquette School of Education, and Myra Edwards, an advisor to Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, will also be on the panel.

The session is sponsored by the Les Aspin Alumni Council and is open to the public.
http://blogs.jsonline.

For CN-CFNBA comments, go to:
School Zone Education Notebook


MPS graduation rate is 46%, study says
District disagrees, but it lags suburbs

By ALAN J. BORSUK
aborsuk@journalsentinel.com
Posted: April 1, 2008

Milwaukee Public Schools was one of 17 urban districts listed with a graduation rate below 50% in a report released Tuesday by America’s Promise Alliance, an organization aimed at promoting solutions to problems affecting America’s youth.

MPS was listed as having a graduation rate of 46.1%, based on data from the 2003-‘04 school year. That put MPS in 38th place among the 50 largest districts in the nation.

But the concern expressed in the report about the graduation rates in urban school systems applied across the breadth of the nation. Overall, including suburban areas, about 70% of students graduate on time with a regular diploma.

Full Story,
46% Graduation Rate


Parents and School Strategic Planning

Parent and Elected Official

Parent and Teachers

Parent and Business Owner

Parent and Technology Training

Parent and Clergy

Parent and Carpooling

Parent and Bike Safety

Grandparents and Family

Bus Transportation

Parent Speakers

Parent on Field Trip

Parent Proctor - Testing

Parent Safety Ambassador

Parents as teachers

Parent/Student - Graduation

Parent/Student - Graduation

Parent/Student - Graduation


We are interested in PARENTS and ALUMNs of the following statutory and government funded institutions to join Milwaukee Association Parent Group. They are:

Milwaukee Public Schools
Milwaukee Area Technical College
Milwaukee - University of Wisconsin

Special In-service Training for Parents and Teachers
Cardinal Stritch University

MEMBERSHIP
Parents are asked to pay a flat rate of $5.00 per year for membership.

Keep coming back.


Come back soon for more. In the meantime, visit one of our fellow divisions, click on, * Barber and Cosmetology


Thank you for stopping in. We hope you do it often.


2006-2007 MPS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Milwaukee Public Schools 8 Districts

WEBSITES
MPS Website

WI Department of Public Instruction website

No Child Left Behind

Frequently Asked Questions - No Child Left Behind

Recommended Links for Parents

Getting Students Help


DPI

MPS District Identified for Improvement Plan Overview

The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction is required by law to annually identify districts that did not make adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward meeting the state’s academic performance standards.

Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) has been identified as a District Identified for Improvement (DIFI) Level 2, based on testing in the 2006–07 school year. As a district, MPS has not made adequate yearly progress for three consecutive years on the same objectives (i.e., reading and mathematics) at the elementary, middle, and high school grade spans.

If MPS misses AYP again in 2007–08, the district moves to a DIFI Level 3status. While the DPI may take corrective action at any time with respect to a district identified for improvement, at the end of the second full year a district is identified for improvement the agency is required to impose corrective action as defined by federal law.

MPS has assessed district and school needs through a Council for Great City Schools review and
developed an Action Plan to Improve Milwaukee Public Schools approved by the MPS Board of Directors.

We all agree with the action plan statement, “We cannot achieve different results without doing things differently.” The DPI is committed to increasing the achievement of all Milwaukee students and closing achievement gaps by building on the work of the Council for Great City Schools, supporting the MPS action plan, and working in collaboration with MPS.

The agency also is directing MPS to implement delineated, high-leverage strategies as a requirement of receiving Title I Supplement Grant funds. The high-leverage strategies include

Offering summer school in all schools identified for improvement (SIFI), starting in the
summer of 2008, with a focus on reading and mathematics instruction.

Expanding reading/mathematics instruction in all SIFI schools at the primary and
intermediate levels and providing reading intervention courses at the high school level
starting with the 2008–09 school year.

Developing a plan for extended calendars of a minimum of 30 additional days of instruction to
be piloted in 2008–09 at two SIFI schools.

Providing targeted professional development for principals of SIFI schools starting this school
year.

Using the district and school improvement accountability model to ensure consistent
implementation of the district DIFI plan and district- and state-identified high-leverage
strategies as well as monitoring of educational plans at the school level.

Additionally, MPS is required by state law to identify all initial educators and provide high-quality mentoring and support.

These high-leverage strategies and the accountability plan advance the commitment of the DPI and MPS to increase achievement, close achievement gaps, and eliminate disparities in student learning in Milwaukee. The DPI is assisting MPS in funding the high-leverage strategies through use of Title I funds, including $3.7 million this year in Title I Supplemental Aid.

To achieve different, improved results for the students of Milwaukee Public Schools and ensure change reaches into the classroom level, it is time to do things differently.

Submitted: October 2007

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 7841, Madison, WI 53707–7841
Street Address: 125 South Webster Street, Madison, WI 53703
Telephone: (608) 266–3390
Toll Free: (800) 441–4563
FAX: (608) 267–1052
TDD: (608) 267–2427
Internet Address: dpi.wi.gov


FORUM ON MPS DIFI PLAN

MILWAUKEE — On March 26, 2008, Superintendent Elizabeth Burmaster, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, held a townhall forum, Italian Community Center, in Milwaukee.

The state superintendent was responding to the state’s responsibility to monitor and provide oversight for the No Child Left Behind program. In October, 2007, DPI identified MPS as a District Identified for Improvement (DIFI) Level 2,. based on testing in the 2006–07.

This was the first meeting held in Milwaukee to address the issue with the public. Behind the scene meetings with MPS Board, Superintendent William G. Andrekopoulos and MPS staff have been held.

POWERPOINT
In addition to State Superintendent Burmaster were Mike Thompson, Exective Assistant - State Superintendent, Ann Yehle, Assistaant Director - Title I and Jacqueline Patterson, Director - Policy Initiative Advisor for the Power Point presentation - Forum on MPS DIFI Plan.

The overview included:

  • The School Experience - Subject matter expectations
  • The School Experience - Accountability under No Child Left Behind
  • AYP - Adequate Yearly Progress - Proficient by 2013–14 = 100% (Math)
  • AYP - Adequate Yearly Progress - Attendance Graudation, Test Participation, Mathematics
  • AYP - Adequate Yearly Progress - Schools and districts must meet the criteria for each of the four AYP objectives:

1. Tespt Participation - 95% of total # of students enrolled in the tested graes
2. Reading - 74% proficient/advanced (FAY - full academic year)
3. Mathematics - 58% proficient/advanced (FAY - full academic year)
4. Attendance/Graduation - 90% of statewide average or growth

Milwaukee Public Schools Assessment

  • Missed AYP - 2002–03
  • Made AYP - 2003–04
  • Missed AYP 2004–05
  • Missed AYP 2005–06 (DIFI Level 1)
  • Missed AYP 2006–07 (DIFI Level 2)

Federal Sanctions for DIFI
(receiving Title I funds)

A state may impose corrective action at any time a district is identified for improvement.

When a district reaches DIFI level 3, the law requires the state to take corrective action.

In fact, the law requires that state to implement corrective action at the end of the second full year a district is identified for improvement.

DPI High Leverage Strategies

  • Summer School in all MPS schols identified for improvement (SIFI - schools identifid for improvement); math and reading foucs
  • Targeted prfessional development for principals in all MPS SIFI schools
  • Extended time for reading and math instruction in all MPS SIFI schools
  • Pilot an extended calendar in 1–2 MPS SIFI schools

Requirements of MPS due to DIFI Status
1. District and School Improvement
2. Teach Qaulity
3. School Finance

1. District and School Improvement

  • Ongoing communication between MPS & DPI; ongoing technical assistance by DPI
  • MPS DIFI plan submission and implementation to include MPS district and school accountability model under NCLB/No Child Left Behind)
  • Hire MPS Director of District and School Improvement

1a. District and School Improvement

  • Submission of 07–08 ESEA (Elementary & Secondary Education Act) Consolidated Application to DPI
  • Implementation of “High Leverage Strategies”

High Leverage Strategies

  • Summer School
  • Summer School in all MPS schols identified for improvement (SIFI - schools identifid for improvement); math and reading foucs
  • Targeted prfessional development for principals in all MPS SIFI schools
  • Extended time for reading and math instruction in all MPS SIFI schools
  • Pilot an extended calendar in 1–2 MPS SIFI schools
  • Alliance for Attendance

Teacher Quality

  • Identificatin of each initial educator
  • identify a qualified mentor for each initial educator & implement a system of support for initial educators
  • Provide quarterly reports on the iplementation of the support syste for initial educators

Teacher Quality

  • Develop & implement a data-base to identify initial eucators
  • MPS Staff attend a DPI-convened Title I Quality Deucator Recruiment & Retention Grant meeting
  • MPS shall submit an individualized support plan to move each teacher identified as not high qualified under NCLB to high qualified.

School Finance

  • Identification of “point of contact” relative to MPS financial matters
  • MPS attendance at DPI-convened federal & state finance workshop
  • MPS finance staff meet annually at least three times with DPI finance staff to review MPS finances.

The final timeframe was left for Questions from the audience.

Summary of questions
Question 1 - The first comment/question was regarding a comment sent by President Peter Blewett, MPS Board of Director, apologizing for not being present and stating that if he had been noticed he would have made arranagement to attend. Additionally, there was a concern regarding possible draconian measures being exacted from DPI.

Response - State Superintendent Burmaster
(all comments are closely paraphased and at points exact as stated)

All were welcome. However, the meeting was held to talk to parents and the public. It was also noted that meetings have been held with MPS Board and the staff of MPS administration.

The oversight was as ordered by the federal mandate.

Question 2- The second question was:
What have you (DPI) done to introduce, train, prepare the parents as an equal partner for success?

Response
Acknowledgement of the importance of parents at the table - it is a community approach - However, it is MPS job to implement the plan and provide the outreach to parents.

Burmaster was quick to point out their role as the oversight arm and that her office would not infringe on the responsibility of MPS. However, she noted the constant input of the lack of inclusion of the public.

Additionally, she asked Mary Glass, questioner, to help her understand the concern if she was not addressing her question.

The clarification by Glass was that, parents are the one’s who get the baby, have the baby and are statutorially responsible for the baby, why are they consistently left out of the pioneering and decision making.

To which it was again acknowledged the importance of parents being at the table and referred as an issue to be address to MPS - State Superintendent William Andrekopoulos and his DIFI appointee, Cheryl Toney.

Question 3 - The next comment and question came from the Office of Senator Lena Taylor - her apology for not being present and questions regarding what was the involvement and role of the University of Wisconsin in providing training in the future for teachers and staff for preparedness.

To the point of specifics for NCLB, more information was needed from the university. Generally, as a member of the Regents, Burmaster stated for UW-M there is the state support of providing needed educational services.

More to come.



  

^ back to top ^

  login 

Last edited by Mary. Based on work by mary.  Page last modified on July 22, 2008

Legal Information |  Designed and built by Emergency Digital. | Hosted by Steadfast Networks